Skip to content
Silverline Legal Notes

      Subjects

      This library

      Passing Things On

      Transfer-on-Death Registrations

      For an owner who wants an asset to go to a particular person without probate, and does not want to give that person anything now, a transfer-on-death registration does exactly what joint ownership is usually chosen for and none of what makes it dangerous.

      Passing Things On6 min readState lawTransfer-on-death registrations

      The Green County Court Clerk's Office on Court Street, just off the public square in Greensburg
      The county court clerk's office in Greensburg. — Nyttend, Public domain, source.

      The rule in short

      A payable-on-death or transfer-on-death registration names somebody to receive an account, security or in many states a vehicle or a property, on the owner's death. The named person has no rights while the owner is alive, cannot access the asset, and does not expose it to their own creditors. The registration passes the asset outside probate and outside the will, is revocable at any time, and is available in most states for a wide range of assets.

      Most of the damage done by joint ownership is done in pursuit of an objective that a transfer-on-death registration achieves cleanly, and the registration is available at the same counter, on the same afternoon, from the same member of staff.

      What a registration does

      Names somebody to receive on death. With the asset passing to them directly, outside probate, on production of a death certificate and identification.

      Gives them nothing before then. No access, no ownership, no ability to transact, and no exposure of the asset to their own creditors or divorce.

      Leaves the owner in full control. Free to spend, sell, close or change the registration at any time without anybody's agreement.

      Avoids probate for that asset. Which is the practical objective in most cases and is achieved without any of the lifetime consequences of joint ownership.

      And is revocable. Which is the feature that distinguishes it most sharply from adding a co-owner, per adding a child to an account.

      What can be registered

      Bank accounts. As payable-on-death, which is available at essentially every institution and is straightforward to set up.

      Brokerage accounts and securities. As transfer-on-death, widely available and covering what is frequently a substantial share of an estate.

      Vehicles. In many states, which removes a small but genuinely irritating piece of estate administration.

      Real property. In a growing number of states through a transfer-on-death deed, which is the most significant of these options.

      And not everything. Since availability varies by state and by institution, which makes asking specifically the only reliable approach.

      FeatureJoint ownershipDeath registration
      Access during the owner's lifeYesNo
      Exposed to the other person's creditorsYesNo
      Revocable by the owner aloneNoYes
      Avoids probateYesYes
      Available for real propertyYesIn many states

      The transfer-on-death deed specifically

      Available in many states. Allowing a home to pass to a named person on death without probate and without any lifetime transfer.

      The owner keeps everything. Full ownership, the right to sell or mortgage, and the ability to revoke the deed at any time.

      Formalities matter. Since these deeds generally must be recorded during the owner's lifetime and defects in execution can defeat them.

      It is a far better answer than adding a child. Achieving the succession result without the creditor, control and care funding consequences.

      And it interacts with everything else. Including care funding recovery, per the home and what happens to it.

      The transfer-on-death deed is the most useful recent development

      For decades the only straightforward way to pass a home without probate was to add somebody to the deed, with every consequence that carries. A growing number of states now allow a transfer-on-death deed, under which the owner keeps everything, can revoke at any time, and the property still passes without probate. Where it is available, it removes the reason for the single most damaging arrangement families make, and a great many people have never heard of it.

      The limitations worth knowing

      It passes an asset, not a plan. So a registration naming one child while a will divides everything equally produces exactly the conflict it was meant to avoid.

      Contingents are frequently overlooked. As with any designation, and a named person who predeceases the owner produces a default outcome.

      It does not avoid debts. Since estates and, in some circumstances, non-probate assets remain reachable by creditors of the deceased.

      It does not help with incapacity. Since the named person has no authority during life, which is what a power of attorney is for.

      And it needs coordinating. With the will and every other designation, per when the plan and the paperwork disagree.

      How to set one up

      Ask the institution by name. For a payable-on-death or transfer-on-death registration, since it is rarely offered unprompted.

      Complete their own form. Since a general written instruction is not a registration and will not be treated as one.

      Name contingents. For the same reasons that apply to every other designation and with the same consequences if omitted.

      Obtain written confirmation. That the registration has been recorded, on the approach in checking and changing a designation.

      And for property, use a lawyer. Since transfer-on-death deeds carry formalities whose failure defeats the whole arrangement.

      These registrations are the quiet solution to a problem families usually solve badly, and they are underused mainly because nobody mentions them.

      The core advantage is that the named person gets nothing until death, which removes every lifetime consequence that makes joint ownership dangerous.

      The owner keeps full control and can revoke at any time, which is precisely what joint ownership does not allow once a co-owner has been added.

      The transfer-on-death deed is the most significant of these options, because it addresses the family home, which is where the largest and most damaging arrangements are usually made.

      Availability varies by state and by institution, which makes asking specifically the only reliable approach, since staff will not raise it.

      The limitations are real: these registrations pass assets rather than implementing a plan, and a set of them made without reference to the will produces incoherence.

      Contingent beneficiaries matter as much here as anywhere, and are omitted as consistently.

      Written confirmation that a registration has been recorded is the step that converts an intention into an outcome, exactly as with any other designation.

      For real property, the formalities are strict enough that this is one of the places where paying for a lawyer is straightforwardly worthwhile.

      And the whole set — deeds, registrations, designations and the will — has to be looked at together at least once, because each of them alone is only a fragment of what will actually happen.

      It is worth adding what these registrations do for the people left behind, which is more than the technical description suggests. Probate takes months, costs money, and lands on somebody who has just been bereaved and is dealing with everything else a death involves.

      An account that passes on production of a death certificate removes all of that for the asset it covers. A family with the funeral to pay for, a mortgage still running and no access to anything is in a materially worse position than one where a current account and a modest savings balance simply transfer.

      That is a good argument for registering at least enough to cover the immediate costs, even for somebody who is content for everything else to pass under a will in the ordinary way. It costs nothing, requires one form per account, and addresses the four weeks after a death that families find hardest.

      It is also, incidentally, the easiest of all these arrangements to explain to somebody reluctant to discuss any of this, because it changes nothing at all while they are alive.

      Points to carry away

      • The named person has no rights during the owner's lifetime.
      • The asset passes outside probate and outside the will.
      • The registration is revocable at any time.
      • It is available for a wide and growing range of assets.
      • It achieves what joint ownership is usually chosen for, without the risks.

      Questions readers ask

      What can be registered this way?

      Bank accounts, brokerage accounts and securities almost everywhere; vehicles in many states; and real property in a growing number of states through a transfer-on-death deed. The availability for real property is the significant recent development, because it allows a home to pass without probate and without any of the lifetime consequences of adding a co-owner. What is available depends on the state and on the institution, and it is worth asking about specifically rather than assuming.

      Can it be changed later?

      Yes, freely, by the owner at any time while they have capacity. That is the central advantage over joint ownership, which cannot be undone without the co-owner's agreement because they have become an owner. A transfer-on-death registration gives the named person nothing until death, so removing or replacing them requires nobody's consent and no explanation. It is entirely within the owner's control throughout, which is what makes it suitable for arrangements that may need to change.

      Does it override the will?

      Yes, in the same way as a beneficiary designation: the asset passes to the named person and never enters the estate, so the will has nothing to dispose of. That makes these registrations part of the same coordination problem as everything else, and a person who registers accounts to one child while leaving a will dividing everything equally has produced two documents saying different things. They need to be looked at together, once, so that the total result is the intended one.

      Sources

      1. Legal Information Institute — Payable on Deathlaw.cornell.edu
      2. Legal Information Institute — Transfer on Death Deedlaw.cornell.edu
      3. Legal Information Institute — Probatelaw.cornell.edu
      4. Legal Information Institute — Beneficiarylaw.cornell.edu
      5. Legal Information Institute — Non-Probate Transferlaw.cornell.edu
      6. Legal Information Institute — Estate Planninglaw.cornell.edu

      Silverline Legal Notes is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

      More in Passing Things On

      Passing Things On

      Checking and Changing a Designation

      A designation review involves listing every account and policy including those with former employers, requesting written confirmation of the current designation from each provider, comparing it against present intentions, submitting changes through the provider's own process, and retaining written confirmation that each change was recorded. Confirmation matters, because a submitted form that was never processed leaves the old designation in place.

      6 min readFederal law

      Passing Things On

      When the Plan and the Paperwork Disagree

      An estate is distributed by whatever combination of documents governs each asset: designations for retirement accounts and policies, the form of ownership for property, registrations where they exist, and the will for everything else. Where these have been made at different times without reference to each other, the total result frequently bears no relation to what was intended, and no document corrects the others.

      6 min readState law

      Passing Things On

      The Form That Overrides a Will

      Retirement accounts, life insurance policies and certain other assets pass by beneficiary designation rather than under a will. The designation controls, and a will that says something different does not override it. For most households these assets represent the larger part of what is passed on, which means the forms — completed years earlier, frequently before a divorce, a remarriage or a death — determine more than the document everybody concentrates on.

      6 min readFederal and state