Skip to content
Silverline Legal Notes

      Subjects

      This library

      Passing Things On

      Checking and Changing a Designation

      Reviewing beneficiary designations sounds like a project and is an afternoon. Find the accounts, ask each provider in writing what they hold, compare it against what is intended now, submit changes, and keep the confirmations.

      Passing Things On6 min readFederal lawBeneficiary designations

      A row of bank cash machines inside the IDS Center in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota
      Cash machines inside the IDS Center, Minneapolis. — Chad Davis from United States, CC BY 2.0, source.

      The rule in short

      A designation review involves listing every account and policy including those with former employers, requesting written confirmation of the current designation from each provider, comparing it against present intentions, submitting changes through the provider's own process, and retaining written confirmation that each change was recorded. Confirmation matters, because a submitted form that was never processed leaves the old designation in place.

      The reason nobody does this is that it sounds like a project requiring a professional. It requires a list, some telephone calls and a folder, and it is the single highest-value afternoon available in this whole subject.

      Finding everything

      Work through the employment history. Every employer in order, noting whether a retirement plan existed, which is how forgotten accounts are actually located.

      Check old statements and tax records. Which show plan contributions and frequently name administrators nobody has thought about in years.

      List insurance policies. Including any provided through employment, through associations or through a bank, which are easily overlooked.

      Include annuities and similar products. Which carry their own designations and are frequently forgotten alongside the accounts.

      And search unclaimed property registries. Maintained by states, which routinely reunite people with accounts they had entirely forgotten existed.

      Confirming what each provider actually holds

      Ask in writing. Rather than by telephone, since a written response is a document and a conversation is a recollection.

      Ask for both primary and contingent. Since the contingent line is where the omissions are and it is frequently not mentioned unless asked about.

      Ask how the plan treats a predeceased beneficiary. Since the default provisions matter and differ, and knowing them shapes what should be named.

      Print any online record. Where a provider makes the designation visible online, which is the quickest form of confirmation available.

      And do it for every account. Including the small ones, since a modest account with a wrong name causes exactly the same family difficulty as a large one.

      StepTime required
      Listing accounts from an employment historyAn hour or two
      Requesting confirmationsAn afternoon of calls and emails
      Deciding what each should sayAn evening
      Submitting changesAn hour
      Obtaining written confirmationsWeeks of waiting

      Deciding what each should say

      Name people specifically. With full names and, where the provider allows, dates of birth, since a form naming my children invites argument about who that includes.

      Name contingents. For every account, which is the single most valuable change most reviews produce.

      Consider percentages carefully. Since they must total correctly and since an uneven split needs to be deliberate rather than inherited from an older form.

      Consider whether a person should receive directly. Where a beneficiary is a minor, has a disability, or would be better served by a trust arrangement.

      And check the spousal position. Since some plans require spousal consent to name anybody else, per spousal consent on a plan.

      A submitted form is not a recorded designation

      Forms go missing, are rejected for a missing signature or an incomplete date, and are occasionally received after a plan has moved to a new administrator. A person who submitted a change and never confirmed it may have exactly the designation they were trying to replace. Asking each provider to confirm in writing that the change has been recorded is the step that converts an intention into an outcome, and it takes one email per account.

      Making the change actually stick

      Use the provider's own form. Since a letter expressing an intention is not a designation and will not be treated as one.

      Complete it fully. Since incomplete forms are rejected, and a rejection nobody notices leaves the old designation in place.

      Submit it as the provider requires. By post, online or in person, following their process rather than a general assumption about how these things work.

      Obtain written confirmation. That the change has been recorded, which is the step that distinguishes a completed change from an attempted one.

      And keep the confirmation. In the same folder as everything else, since it is what answers any later question about what was intended.

      Keeping it current afterward

      Review after any life event. Marriage, divorce, birth, death or a change of employer, each of which can invalidate the assumptions behind a form.

      Review on a schedule regardless. Every few years, on the approach in the review nobody schedules.

      Watch for plan transfers. Since an administrator change can require a fresh designation and nobody is told about it in terms they would notice.

      Tell somebody where the folder is. Since a perfect set of records nobody can find achieves nothing at all.

      And check it against the will. Once, so that the two produce the intended overall result, per when the plan and the paperwork disagree.

      This exercise has an unearned reputation for difficulty, largely because it sits between the will, which people pay for, and the everyday administration nobody schedules.

      It is a list, some written requests and a folder. The hardest part is finding old employers' plans, and that is a matter of patience rather than expertise.

      The written confirmation of what a provider currently holds is the step that makes the whole thing worthwhile, because memory about forms completed decades ago is essentially worthless.

      Contingent beneficiaries are where most reviews find the biggest gap, and filling those lines is the highest-value change most people will make.

      Naming people specifically, with full names, prevents an argument later about who a general description was meant to include.

      Confirming that a change was actually recorded is what separates a completed review from an attempted one, and it is the step most often skipped.

      The folder matters as much as the forms, because a family that cannot find the records has to reconstruct everything from statements and guesswork.

      Somebody should know where the folder is, which requires a single sentence and is forgotten with remarkable consistency.

      The whole thing repays repeating every few years, since the circumstances that made a set of designations correct do not stay still.

      And it protects more value, for less effort, than any other single step available in this area, which is a strange thing to have to argue for and consistently necessary.

      One practical note about how to make it actually happen, since knowing it should be done has never been the obstacle. Attach it to something else that is already scheduled: a will appointment, a birthday with a round number, a tax filing, or the afternoon spent assembling documents for an identification card.

      Tasks with no deadline and no external prompt do not get done by people who intend to do them. They get done by people who attached them to something that was going to happen anyway, which is the only reliable technique available for anything of this kind.

      For families helping an older relative, this is also a genuinely useful thing to offer. Sitting at a table with a list of employers and a telephone is not difficult, it does not require anybody to discuss death or money in any uncomfortable way, and it is the kind of practical help that most parents accept readily.

      Points to carry away

      • List every account and policy, including old employers' plans.
      • Request written confirmation of what each provider holds.
      • Compare against present intentions rather than memory.
      • Submit changes through the provider's own process.
      • Retain written confirmation that each change was recorded.

      Questions readers ask

      How are forgotten accounts found?

      From a working history: every employer, in order, with a note of whether a plan existed. Old statements, tax records showing plan contributions, and any correspondence from plan administrators all help. Where an account is genuinely lost, national registries and unclaimed property databases maintained by states are worth searching, and they routinely reunite people with accounts they had entirely forgotten. This is the part of the exercise that takes the longest and produces the most, and it frequently finds real money as well as an outdated form.

      Why does written confirmation matter?

      Because a form submitted is not the same as a designation recorded. Forms are lost, are rejected for incomplete information, or are received after a plan has been transferred to a new administrator. Requesting written confirmation that the change has been processed closes that gap, and it produces the document a family will need if a designation is ever questioned. Where a provider offers an online record of the current designation, a printed copy serves the same purpose.

      Do the designations need to match the will?

      They need to reflect the same intentions, which is not the same thing. A will and a set of designations that between them produce the intended overall result are working correctly, even though they cover different assets. What causes difficulty is a plan constructed on the assumption that the will governs everything, since the designations will then distribute the largest assets on a basis nobody considered. Reviewing them together, once, is what produces a coherent outcome.

      Sources

      1. 29 U.S.C. § 1104 — Fiduciary dutieslaw.cornell.edu
      2. 29 U.S.C. § 1024 — Filing and disclosurelaw.cornell.edu
      3. Legal Information Institute — Beneficiarylaw.cornell.edu
      4. Legal Information Institute — Willlaw.cornell.edu
      5. Legal Information Institute — Probatelaw.cornell.edu
      6. Legal Information Institute — Estate Planninglaw.cornell.edu

      Silverline Legal Notes is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

      More in Passing Things On

      Passing Things On

      Transfer-on-Death Registrations

      A payable-on-death or transfer-on-death registration names somebody to receive an account, security or in many states a vehicle or a property, on the owner's death. The named person has no rights while the owner is alive, cannot access the asset, and does not expose it to their own creditors. The registration passes the asset outside probate and outside the will, is revocable at any time, and is available in most states for a wide range of assets.

      6 min readState law

      Passing Things On

      When the Plan and the Paperwork Disagree

      An estate is distributed by whatever combination of documents governs each asset: designations for retirement accounts and policies, the form of ownership for property, registrations where they exist, and the will for everything else. Where these have been made at different times without reference to each other, the total result frequently bears no relation to what was intended, and no document corrects the others.

      6 min readState law

      Passing Things On

      The Form That Overrides a Will

      Retirement accounts, life insurance policies and certain other assets pass by beneficiary designation rather than under a will. The designation controls, and a will that says something different does not override it. For most households these assets represent the larger part of what is passed on, which means the forms — completed years earlier, frequently before a divorce, a remarriage or a death — determine more than the document everybody concentrates on.

      6 min readFederal and state