Skip to content
Silverline Legal Notes

      Subjects

      This library

      Capacity & Advance Planning

      What a Power of Attorney Actually Does

      It is the most useful document most people will ever sign and the most widely misunderstood. It authorizes somebody to act in another's name, it survives the loss of capacity if drafted to do so, and it stops working entirely at the moment of death.

      Capacity & Advance Planning6 min readState lawPowers of attorney

      A printed contract lying on a desk in warm light, with a pen resting across the signature block
      A contract waiting at the signature block. — Blogtrepreneur, CC BY 2.0, source.

      The rule in short

      A power of attorney authorizes a chosen person to act on somebody's behalf in financial and legal matters. A durable one continues to operate after the maker loses capacity, which is the whole point of having one. It grants authority without removing the maker's own, ends automatically on death, and does not cover healthcare decisions, which require a separate document. The powers granted are only those the document actually confers.

      Almost every difficult situation involving an incapacitated parent traces back to the same absence. There was no power of attorney, or there was one that nobody could use, and everything afterward became harder and slower than it needed to be.

      What the document actually does

      It appoints somebody to act. In the maker's name, in matters the document specifies, which may be broad or narrowly confined to particular transactions.

      It creates authority, not obligation. The person appointed may act; the document does not compel them to, and they may decline the role entirely.

      It is additive. The maker retains full authority to act for themselves, so nothing is given up by signing one while capacity remains.

      It is durable if it says so. A durable power continues after the maker loses capacity, which is the whole reason most people make one.

      And it covers what it covers. Authority extends only to what the document confers, so a general power and a specific one behave very differently.

      What it does not do

      It does not survive death. Authority ends at that moment, and everything afterward belongs to whoever administers the estate.

      It does not cover healthcare. Which requires a separate instrument, discussed in the two halves of a health directive.

      It does not transfer ownership. The attorney-in-fact acts in the maker's name and for the maker's benefit, never in their own right.

      It does not override the maker. Who may revoke it, act contrary to it, or simply do things themselves while they retain capacity.

      And it does not license self-dealing. Since the person appointed owes duties described in what an agent owes.

      QuestionFinancial power of attorney
      Covers money and propertyYes
      Covers medical decisionsGenerally no
      Survives loss of capacityYes, if durable
      Survives deathNo
      Removes the maker's own authorityNo

      The powers worth including

      Banking and investment. Operating accounts, dealing with institutions and managing investments, which is the core of ordinary use.

      Real property. Selling, mortgaging or letting, which requires express authority in most places and is frequently omitted from short forms.

      Tax matters. Filing and dealing with revenue authorities, which usually requires its own specific authorization to be accepted.

      Benefit and pension administration. Dealing with the bodies that pay income, which some agencies handle under their own separate procedures.

      And gifting, if intended. Which should be expressly addressed either way, since a general power is often read as excluding it.

      Authority stops at the moment of death

      A son who has managed his mother's accounts under a power of attorney for three years has no authority the day after she dies. Paying a funeral bill from her account, closing a policy or dealing with the house are all acts he is no longer permitted to take, however reasonable each is. What follows death is estate administration, which requires its own appointment. Families cross this line constantly without realizing there was one.

      When it takes effect

      Immediately, in most cases. Which is the more usable arrangement and the one most practitioners recommend, for the reasons in immediate or springing.

      Or on a defined event. A springing power, taking effect on incapacity established in the way the document specifies.

      Durability is a separate question. From when it starts, and a document can be immediate and durable, which is the usual combination.

      And acceptance is another. Since institutions may hesitate for reasons unconnected to the drafting, examined in why an institution refuses one.

      Which is why timing matters. A document made and tested while somebody is well works; one made in a hurry during a crisis frequently does not.

      Why it matters so much

      The alternative is a court process. Slower, public, expensive and controlled by somebody other than the family, as set out in what is left with nothing signed.

      Bills still need paying. And nobody without authority can operate an incapacitated person's accounts, however obvious the need.

      Care decisions have financial elements. Deposits, agreements and applications, all of which require somebody with authority to sign.

      Delay causes real harm. Mortgages fall into arrears, insurance lapses and opportunities close while a family waits for authority.

      And it costs almost nothing. Which is the striking part: the document that prevents all of that is among the cheapest anybody will ever sign.

      The case for making one of these is close to unanswerable. It is inexpensive, it takes nothing away while capacity remains, and its absence converts every subsequent difficulty into a court process.

      The resistance older people feel is almost always based on a misunderstanding: that signing hands over control. It does not, and saying so plainly resolves the conversation more often than any amount of persuasion about prudence.

      The two documents — financial and healthcare — should both exist, because they are used by different institutions in different situations, and holding one while needing the other is a familiar and avoidable frustration.

      What goes in the document matters as much as having one. Real property, tax matters and gifting all need express treatment, and a short form downloaded and signed frequently omits precisely the power that turns out to be needed.

      Timing matters too. A document made while somebody is well, taken to their bank and confirmed as acceptable, is a document that will work. One signed in a hospital during a crisis is frequently questioned at exactly the moment nobody can afford a delay.

      And the death point deserves repeating, because it catches people who have done everything else right. Authority ends there, completely and instantly, and what follows is a different appointment altogether.

      There is one further practical point that saves families a great deal of trouble. Institutions frequently want to see the original document rather than a copy, and some will insist on retaining one. Making several originals at the time of signing, rather than one, avoids the situation where an agent cannot deal with a bank because a registry is holding the only copy.

      It is also worth taking the document to the main institutions while the maker is well, and asking whether they will accept it. Banks in particular have their own requirements, and discovering an objection during an ordinary week is a very different problem from discovering it in a hospital car park.

      Neither of those steps takes long, and between them they turn a document that exists into a document that works. The gap between those two things is where most of the difficulty in this subject actually lives. A family that has done both can act on the day something happens, and that is the entire benefit anybody is buying when they sign one of these.

      Points to carry away

      • A power of attorney authorizes somebody to act in financial matters.
      • A durable one survives the maker's loss of capacity.
      • It does not remove the maker's own authority to act.
      • It ends at death and does not extend to the estate.
      • Healthcare decisions require a separate document.

      Questions readers ask

      Does it continue after death?

      No, and this is the most consequential misunderstanding about it. A power of attorney ends at the moment of death. From that point the person with authority is whoever is appointed to administer the estate, which may or may not be the same individual. An attorney-in-fact who continues to operate accounts, pay bills or deal with property after a death is acting without authority, however sensible their actions are. The change of authority happens instantly and it catches a great many well-meaning family members.

      Does the maker lose the ability to act?

      No. Granting a power of attorney adds somebody who may act; it does not remove the maker's own authority. A person who signs one continues to manage their own affairs exactly as before and can do everything they could do previously. Families frequently believe that signing hands control over, which is one of the main reasons older people resist making one. Understanding that it is additive rather than transferring removes most of that resistance, and it is worth saying explicitly.

      Does it cover medical decisions?

      Generally not. A financial power of attorney and a healthcare document are separate instruments serving different purposes, and a person needs both. Families discover the gap at a hospital, where somebody holding a financial power is told it does not authorize them to make treatment decisions. Some jurisdictions permit combined documents, and many practitioners nonetheless prefer them separate, because the two are used by different institutions in different circumstances and a document that tries to do both is often accepted for neither.

      Sources

      1. Legal Information Institute — Power of Attorneylaw.cornell.edu
      2. Legal Information Institute — Agencylaw.cornell.edu
      3. Legal Information Institute — Fiduciary Dutylaw.cornell.edu
      4. Legal Information Institute — Capacitylaw.cornell.edu
      5. Legal Information Institute — Elder Lawlaw.cornell.edu
      6. Legal Information Institute — Estatelaw.cornell.edu

      Silverline Legal Notes is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

      More in Capacity & Advance Planning

      Capacity & Advance Planning

      Revoking or Replacing a Document

      A person with capacity may revoke a power of attorney or an advance directive at any time. Revocation is generally made in writing and, in the case of documents affecting property, may need to be recorded where the original was. The critical step is notice: agents and third parties who act without knowledge of a revocation may be protected, so the practical work is telling every institution and recovering every copy that exists.

      6 min readState law

      Capacity & Advance Planning

      Why an Institution Refuses a Valid Document

      Institutions refuse powers of attorney because the document is old, because it lacks a specific power they require, because it is a copy rather than an original, because their own form exists, or because staff are cautious about liability. Many jurisdictions now impose consequences for unreasonable refusal, and most obstacles are removed by asking for the reason in writing, escalating past the counter, and addressing the specific objection.

      6 min readState law

      Capacity & Advance Planning

      What an Agent Owes the Person They Act For

      An attorney-in-fact owes fiduciary duties: to act in the maker's interest rather than their own, to keep the maker's property separate from their own, to keep records adequate to account for what was done, to act within the authority granted, and to avoid conflicts. Breaches are frequently committed innocently, by relatives who mix funds or make gifts they assumed were expected. The exposure is personal and can extend well beyond repayment.

      6 min readState law